The Swedenborg Scientific Association, The New Philosophy Online Preserving, Translating, Publishing, and Distributing the Scientific and Philosophical Works of Emanuel Swedenborg
 

Home

 

Mission Statement

  Board of Directors
  Principles of the New Philosophy
  Summary
  A Brief Chronology
  History
  Catalog
  European Orders
  SPI Newsletter
  Current Issue
  Other Articles
  Archive
  Submitting Articles
  Members Area
  Becoming a Member
  How to Contact Us
  Are you a Bookseller?
  Bookstores & Publishers
  Swedenborg
  Philosophy
  The New Church

Swedenborg's Alleged Insanity

Rev. Brian M. Talbot, B.A., Dip. Ed.

How do you know that someone is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Maybe the person's reputation for honesty and integrity, or his or her expertise or specialty or interest in the subject under discussion, or even our past experiences of the person concerned? Maybe the person's beliefs, biases or presuppositions are enough like ours or exactly like ours to justify believing the person? If we're talking to someone, maybe it's their body language or their facial expressions, which convince us of their sincerity, or then maybe we rely wholly or solely on our instincts or 'gut reaction'? Maybe it's because their argument or case is reasonable, or their explanation of known or agreed facts is the best? Maybe a lot of their case is based on a commonly accepted authority figure or book, such as the inspired books of the Bible? Maybe we can be convinced by how confident or erudite the speaker is? I remember one of my Mathematics lecturers at university, warning us undergraduates never to believe anyone who said something was "clearly true," and there are advocates on both sides of any debate who use superlatives and state how clearly, obviously and indisputably true their opinion is.

How do we know that anyone from over 200 years ago is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Some of my suggestions listed above, such as the person's body language or facial expressions, will not be able to be brought into finding an answer. This is the question people will have to ask when they consider the story which originated with a certain John Paul Brockmer, a Londoner of the Moravian faith, in whose house Swedenborg lodged around 1744 and possibly later,1 and who claimed that Swedenborg called himself the Messiah, foamed at the mouth, ran into the street naked and jumped into the mud. (This story will be examined in much greater detail later on this article.)


Permission to reprint this study was kindly granted by the author. It was originally published in a series as follows: "Swedenborg's Alleged Insanity." New-Church Magazine Part 1 (March 1996): 22: 2­28; Part 2 (May 1996): 23: 2­28; Part 3 (December 1996): 24: 4­6. Note: In endnotes to Swedenborg's works, the numbers refer to paragraphs. Where reference is made to articles formatted in columns, "a" and "b" refer to the column on a given page.


The New Philosophy is a publication of the Swedenborg Scientific Association
Incorporated October 20, 1906

This association was organized on May 27, 1898, for the preservation, translation, publication, and distribution of the scientific and philosophical works of Emanuel Swedenborg, and for the promotion of the principles taught in them, having in view likewise their relation to the science and philosophy of the present day.

The views expressed by authors are not necessarily those held by the Editor or the Editorial Board

Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 06-37082
ISSN 0028-6443